ABSTRACT
Background. Acinetobacter baumannii typically causes infections in debilitated, hospitalized patients and is difficult to treat due to multiple virulence factors and the presence of intrinsic and acquired antibiotic resistance mechanisms leading to frequent isolation of multi-drug resistant (MDR) phenotypes. Due to problematic pharmacokinetics and/or dose-limiting toxicities of salvage agents, combination therapy with aminoglycosides, ampicillin/sulbactam, polymyxins, minocycline, or tigecycline, is often used. Eravacycline has demonstrated greater in-vitro potency against A. baumannii compared to other tetracycline derivatives making it potentially the more appealing option. However, its utility is hindered by a lack of data supporting pharmacodynamic targets and adequate dosing strategies for CRAB. The goal of this case series was to describe our experience with the use of combination eravacycline therapy for the treatment of CRAB pneumonia. Methods. This case series included all patients >= 18 years of age, diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2, >= 1 sputum culture positive for CRAB and a clinical diagnosis of new bacterial pneumonia, who received at least one dose of eravacycline between April 1st and October 1st, 2020. The primary outcome was clinical resolution of CRAB pneumonia. Secondary outcomes evaluated microbiological resolution, need for extended durations of therapy, and frequency of re-starting CRAB therapy within 48 hours of completion. Results. In total, 25 patients were included in this case series. The median duration of combination therapy was 10 days. Most patients (96%) received eravacycline + ampicillin/sulbactam, with 7 of those patients also receiving inhaled colistin (Table 2). In total, 17 (68%) patients achieved clinical resolution of CRAB pneumonia. Post-treatment sputum cultures were collected in 18 patients, of which 13 (72%) achieved microbiological resolution. One patient received > 14 days of therapy and no patients re-initiated therapy within 48 hours of eravacycline completion. Table 1: Baseline Characteristics Table 2: Study Outcomes Conclusion. In this small case series, eravacycline showed favorable clinical outcomes in patients with CRAB pneumonia. In light of limited treatment options, this agent can be considered for CRAB pneumonia salvage therapy.
ABSTRACT
Background. Dalbavancin is a long-acting second-generation lipoglycopeptide antibiotic with potent activity against Gram-positive organisms. Dalbavancin is currently FDA approved for acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infections (ABSSTIs). Growing evidence suggests that patients can be successfully treated with dalbavancin for indications outside of skin and soft tissue infections which include bacteremia and osteomyelitis (OM) with significant cost savings and reduced length of stay. We developed a protocol for the use of dalbavancin in patients who required intravenous antibiotics for serious bacterial infections but did not qualify for outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT). During the COVID-19 pandemic, we expanded the protocol to reduce the amount of clinical contact required for all patients. Methods. In this retrospective observational study, we reviewed all patients that received at least one dose of dalbavancin in either inpatient or outpatient setting at Parkland Hospital from July 2019 through February 2021. Patient demographics, type of infection, and rationale for dalbavancin were collected at baseline. Clinical response was measured by avoidance of Emergency Department (ED) visits or hospital readmission at 30, 60, and 90 days. In addition, a separate analysis was conducted to estimate hospital, rehabilitation, or nursing home days saved based on their diagnosis and projected length of treatment. Results. Twenty-eight patients (24 inpatient, 4 outpatient) were included in the study. The majority were uninsured (89%), homeless (64%), or had active intravenous drug use (IDU) (60%). Indications for use included SSTI (42.9%), bacteremia (64.3%), and OM (42.6%). Clinical failure was observed in 4 (14%), 1 (3.5%), and 2 (7.1%) patients at 30, 60, or 90 days (respectively). Nonadherence to medical recommendations, lack of source control, and ongoing IDU increased risk of returning to the hospital. Dalbavancin use saved a total of 381 days of inpatient/rehab/facility stay. Conclusion. Dalbavancin showed similar rates of success with improved length of stay and cost savings. The use of long acting lipoglycopeptides are desirable alternatives to traditional OPAT for patients that otherwise would not qualify for OPAT or desire less hospital contact.